Everyone is speculating on exactly why Apple is making the purchase, and as is typical, Apple is smartly mum. What's perhaps more interesting is what precisely is being purchased, as the New York Times reports that the record labels have the equivalent of an out clause, which means that the licenses aren't transferable to an acquirer. So what's the deal, literally and figuratively?
Here's what I think is happening:
Apple has basically cornered the market on MP3 digital downloads, podcasts, etc., but as it surveys consumer behavior and the competitive marketplace, it is recognizing that the upside potential of digital downloads will begin to level. Finally, at long last, and despite Steve Jobs' arguments to the contrary, consumers are starting to show a penchant for access over ownership...at least with regards to music and video media. Music-wise, this is manifest in the continued growth -- at least in usage -- of companies like Pandora, Slacker, et al. With the competitive specter (and great pumpkin) of Spotify on the horizon, Apple sees this acquisition as a way to purchase intellectual expertise (people) and property (IP) as well as some infrastructure (IT) to jump into this marketplace.
One could conceivably ask why Apple would want to fortify a business that in and of itself is not particularly profitable. I think the answer is as simple as the business rationale for the continued investment in iTunes; it helps sell hardware: iPods, iPhones, Macs and hopefully Apple TVs and iTablets, and that is a very good business for Apple, which rakes in a lion's share of profits from higher end consumer electronics and computers.
What does this mean?
I think it's a great time to be a gadget-crazy, music loving consumer. The world's entire music collection -- from the hits to the obscurities -- will finally be at our fingertips, literally. It might also be a good time to be a record label after 10 very difficult years.
What's your take?
Jonathan Cohen





Comments (5)
It hints that Apple want to take out spotify if you ask me, or at least capture a huge share of the pay monthly model of music.
Posted on December 8, 2009 06:38
You might be right, but it's unclear that such a huge share would be particularly profitable in and of itself.
Thanks for posting!
Posted on December 8, 2009 11:46
While I get the intent, Apple has not "cornered the market on MP3 digital downloads" - they continue to sell music in a propietary file format and, while they have removed DRM from a large portion, there are still tracks with DRM. MP3 would suggest that the file has no restrictions on the type of player, number of times it can be burned to disc, etc. This does not describe Apple's offering.
Posted on December 9, 2009 13:08
Eric,
You are right with regards to Apple's use of their proprietary AAC file format and not MP3. I was using MP3 in a generic and admittedly inaccurate sense. In any case, iTunes controls a large amount of the legitimate (i.e., paid) music digital download business. Other digital retailers seem to have been unable to dent it despite pretty good offerings (like Amazon).
Thanks for the correction.
-Jonathan
Posted on December 23, 2009 23:34
ads... that's a way to make money. I know last.fm is now catching on and exhibiting ads on their webpage, so they can make some money out of their music streaming business.
Posted on December 10, 2009 10:40