organic logo

March 10th, 2009

The Rise of the Creative Technologists

dm_tech1.jpgToday’s marketer has to wrestle with a plethora of new platforms,
channels, and delivery medium. She needs to deliver emotionally
resonating messaging to online, offline, out of home, set top, personal
computer, mobile, laptop, occasionally connected, touch sensitive, and
always on devices.

A week or two ago, Randall Rothenberg’s post on “heartbeats and mouse clicks”
broke open a topic that has been seething below the normal work-a-day
lives of interactive marketers for a long time. Randall opens his
article with:
Quick — name four fantastic, emotionally resonant, culturally
significant and successful interactive advertising campaigns from the
past year.

How did you do? Did you find a campaign that really emotionally engaged
you? That nameless visceral reaction to an idea, an image, a word, an
experience. Like Randall, I couldn’t name any. Nothing. The closest I
could come was the RG/A Nike+ integration. I didn’t have a visceral
reaction to it, but the elegance and simplicity and the change in
behavior it has wrought with me is certainly something that stands out.

The central tenet of Randall’s piece is that with the “change in
medium” or more likely the divergence of the digital medium and the
ever increasing inclusion of that medium in our daily lives, marketers
must change the core of their creative engine to accommodate this.
Designers who understand technology. Copywriters who get how to
encapsulate a concept in a world of pixels and aspect ratios, and
technologists who understand the importance of the total experience not
just getting the rounded corners and drop shadows correct, but why
focusing on the design as much as the functionality creates an
immersive experience.

When I joined Organic our software teams were in a department called
“Engineering”. In my minds eye, I had a fundamental problem with that
department title. Were we just engineers? Awaiting the designs, plans,
and dreams of the architect and urban planners, ready to command armies
of construction workers to create the master plan? Surely, we had the
skill set to have ideas, provide concepts, and make sure the bathroom
stall door still swings open despite the artistic placement of the
equipment.

Computing has evolved, we have evolved with it. Traditional
technology delivery was designed to handle the captive audience. You
could ship a 1000 page manual to those who would have to use your
software. Today, users choose the best software for the task, they
interface with many pieces, often assembling a whole that the software
team never envisioned. How can you “codify all requirements first” in
this world? We need a new way. Today’s technology doesn’t fit this
pattern at all. Feeds, interfaces, APIs and services evolve on a
monthly basis across the internet. It is an axiom of software and
hardware development that requirements change, clients change their
minds, and customers want something more, something different,
something tangible and new every day.

One of the things that many agencies have been struggling with is
the perception and inclusion of technology in the creative process. As
Randall points out: in the beginning there was the copy writer, and
life was good. The graphic artist was the layout man. Sometimes a very
talented layout man, but purely layout. Then the shift to more engaging
media pushed the graphic designer into the forefront. She or he became
the focal point of a creative team. Mass media drew us to the 30s spot,
that small snippet of your lives, lost to a marketers idea of how to
entice you to remember their brand, their product, their creative next
time you were in a purchase situation.

Randall posits the rise of the creative technologists as those who
understand the Craft of weaving technology into a concept. Technology
development is already part art, part science. Adding the right kind of
technologist to the process is what is required to weave together a
creative team that is ready to adapt to changing user and media needs
in real time.

Bang, clunk, kerthwop. This was what had been
seething below the surface, this was what had been bothering me about
engineering. In light of this, I began to envision how to create a
creative technology team. A team that can seamlessly integrate with
creative concept teams, design teams, quality teams, clients, and
customers. We will need some new skills, a re-prioritization of current
skills, and an refactoring of how we work together. The first step down
this path for us is a simple rebranding. 

dm_tech2.jpgToday, developers at Organic
are no longer Engineering. We are Technology. We are masters of our
Craft. We are strong. We are conceptual, we are creative, we are the
total experience engine that powers the modern agency. We are
Technology.

Dean McRobie

8 icon: comments 0 icon: connections + Share
  • Dean says:

    And just after posting this, Chad pointed out this http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/digital/e3i77fdd1ea9c8421a4fcf75b32b1ce2ccb this, I guess is the alternate solution: BIGGER ADS!

  • Sarah Jo Sautter says:

    I, too, struggle with the title trap. I’ve been labeled a writer, copywriter, digital writer, senior writer and now associate creative director when really I’ve also been a content strategist and conceptor of advertising ideas, among other roles. I’m offended when a designer hands me a beautiful site he/she created alone and says, “Okay, add your copy.” Creating digital ideas isn’t linear.
    Dean, I always saw your team as partners in facilitating ideas. So congrats on finally getting a name that lives up to that!

  • Karri Ojanen says:

    Great post, Dean. Like Sarah and you, I’ve struggled with the title trap. As much as I like concentrating on the field of IA, that’s not nearly all that I (need to) do in order to do my work comprehensively. I still think I was happier with the title Concept Designer that I had in the past, but settle for the current Information Architect. After all, titles don’t need to stop us from creating a better approach to how we do our work together.
    Developers are definitely partners in facilitating ideas. And I’ve had a developer help me solve an architecture problem more than once.

  • Marta Strickland says:

    I don’t even know what my title really means, and I don’t think anyone else does either… “strategist”. Honestly we are all strategists, we just have a different type of strategy we are bringing to the table. It is so very essential that we have a “technology strategist” early on in the process to bring insight and ideas to the table that no one else would have thought of otherwise. Same goes for content strategy and design strategy.
    It used to be that my position was called a “interactive strategist” or “digital planner”. But interactive/digital became to broad. I guess that is why I have been calling myself a “social media strategist” lately, but there are thousands of those just on Twitter alone. Social has become to broad too!

  • Sandy Marsh says:

    This is the same struggle Information Architects have had since the beginning. Our recent push to be called Experience Architects gets us much closer to what we actually do. We’re not just structuring information, but entire experiences.
    I’ve always felt a kinship to Engineering, er, Technology, for this very reason – we’ve been labeled in such a way to cause others to believe we are not creative. But, if you’ve been paying attention, even just a little, to what we do, you’ll understand the stigma is not the reality.

  • Joshua K. Blair says:

    At the turn of the century I was working in an IT department as “the webmaster.” Talk about a title! Essentially, I was a glorified web developer at a large global brand with a penchant for fancy titles that was still focusing its technology efforts on EDI and reports pumped out by AS400s. It was a little lonely being left to the wolves of the marketers who were constantly coming up with wild ideas like “online product giveaways” and “email list sign ups.” They would write these ideas up and pass them through the departmental wall for analysis and approval. I’d have to serve as a technical pm who would determine resources and cost. But I was never really asked my opinion about the ideas, or if I had any ideas to contribute (and despite what Dean may say, I have had a few good ideas over the years). The IT department was a cost center controlled by the CFO, not a strategic value center.
    Fast-forward to today and I am at an agency where we ascribe to the McRobien philosophy of incorporating our technologists (and other walks of life) into our process of ideation. Clients have challenges to solve. They need ideas based on Digital Insights in order to develop solutions that incorporate what we call “the art of technology” to move people to action. Our experience has shown that the best way to get these solutions is to engage elements of the entire organization in the conversation as early as possible. And that means don’t forget about those cool technology folks.
    So, as the executive Dean of technology implies, you don’t have to keep those IT/Technology guys in the basement anymore, let them come out and play. Plus, those guys make a lot of money. Why not make them earn their pay instead of just doing what they are told?

  • Alexis Maddocks says:

    Hi! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers? I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on. Any suggestions?Plano Roofing Pros, 3420 14th Street, #103-C, Plano, TX 75074 – (214) 556-5050

  • Tahlia Garran says:

    I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was curious what all is needed to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very web savvy so I’m not 100% sure. Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanksPalm Harbor Roofing, 1334 Tampa Rd., #189, Palm Harbor, FL 34683 – (727) 233-7338

  • Add to the Conversation