
(image credit: FCW Insider blog)
Web 3.0 has been a fairly exciting subject in the industry for many of us. Over the past few years, we've been watching what Web 2.0 has done to our daily lives, the way we talk with our friends, the way we find information, the way we shop, the way we navigate the web, and even the way we navigate the world we live in. It's empowering, and it seems only natural to ask... well, what's next?
Still, there is one fairly large area that influences our lives that has been left off of the list in the Web 2.0 Awards. While there are many remarkable examples in the categories of education, health, and real estate, there hasn't been an award given for a best US Government 2.0 website. The revolution just hasn't happened yet, and considering the philosophy of Web 2.0, it is easy to understand why. Richard MacManus of ReadWriteWeb describes the philosophy as "letting go of control, sharing ideas and code, building on what others have built, and freeing your data." While that doesn't sound like something the government would ever embrace, there are some major signs that the revolution is approaching.
The Signs...
1. Strong Examples from Other Countries
In the UK, the Power of Information Taskforce has released gigabytes of new or previously invisible public information from the census, health care, and education with a very interesting challenge to the public. The site is called Show Us A Better Way and it invites people to submit mashup ideas for development funding (the best will receive £20,000). Innovative examples have already surfaced that latch onto government location data to streamline the street repair process (FixMyStreet) and allow residents to know a lot more about crime, housing prices, and statistics of their local areas (UpMyStreet). From the realm of public discourse, there is SpinDifferent, which compares public policy from the UK, US, and UN, and CommentOnThis, that allows the public to comment line by line on governement documents.
While freeing your data is one of the strongest commandments of Web 2.0, so is sharing and dialogue, the social in social media. Both the United Kingdom (They Work For You) and the European Union (myparl.eu) have created social networks that allow citizens to keep tabs on and communicate with elected and unelected government officials. Recently, the Canadian government has been using Second Life for recruiting purposes. And the governments of Thailand, Malaysia, Australia and New Zealand are using blogs, both officially and unofficially. In March, political blogging changed the outcome of the Malaysian election.
2. The Start of US Government 2.0
Not to say there haven't been any examples on domestic soil. Web 2.0 is slowly seeping into government sites at all levels. The state of Virginia portal website features podcasts, a YouTube channel, and a series of blog/social widgets. The Maine portal supports microformats and mobile serveices. USA.gov has a blog actually run by real people who use authentic language instead of PR voice. But still, each of these are lacking that open data and citizen collaboration that is needed to really push govenment into 2.0. Award-winning mashups like ChicagoCrime.org, which has now been sucked under the greater effort EveryBlock, prove that if you open the data, the developers will come.
3. November 2008
While not trying to use ThreeMinds as a political platform, it is hard to talk about Government 2.0 without discussing the upcoming election. In one corner, we have a candidate who has admitted to not knowing how to use a computer and who has outright said that he hates bloggers. In the other corner, we have a candidate who has used Web 2.0 to its fullest capacity through out the campaign and who stands for an unprecendented plan for open internet and open government.
Technology and net neutrality have been seemingly footnotes in a debate focused on economy, the war, gas prices, and health care. That is too bad, because in a country where typical policy change can move excruitiatingly slow, innovative changes in technology and web, where data already exists, where people already congregate, and where tools are already built, could promise some fairly quick and powerful change.
Some items off of one candidate's extensive technology plan:
- Make government data available online in universally accessible formats to allow citizens to make use of that data to comment, derive value, and take action in their own communities.
- Require his appointees who lead Executive Branch departments and rulemaking agencies to conduct the significant business of the agency in public, so that any citizen can watch a live feed on the Internet as the agencies debate and deliberate the issues that affect American society. Ensure that these proceedings are archived for all Americans to review, discuss and respond.
- Lift the veil from secret deals in Washington with a web site, a search engine, and other web tools that enable citizens easily to track online federal grants, contracts, earmarks, and lobbyist contacts with government officials.
- Give the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days before signing any non-emergency legislation.
- Employ technologies, including blogs, wikis and social networking tools, to modernize internal, cross-agency, and public communication and information sharing to improve government decision-making.
With Gen Y, a group reportedly as large as the Baby Boomers, stepping into the booth this election season, it will be interesting to see how policies like this could influence their vote. Gen Y is looking for online communication, collaboration, and calls to get involved.
"Ys are going to be demanding voters, pressing for two-way, detailed and honest communication with the president and his administration," said Jeff Chao, IT specialist, Integrated Technology Services, General Services Administration (GSA). "It's not E-Gov to them, it's My-Gov. TV will provide broad reach, but it will not be enough to satisfy Ys' needs for real-time information and interaction."
As brand after brand embraces consumer collaboration, the expectations within every generation will turn to the government. The time for MyGov is now. Let the revolution begin!
Marta Strickland





Comments (4)
Continued drama over Government 2.0...
Congress proposes limiting the way Congressman can engage with certain online conversations tools, either through disclaimers or a move to government controlled tools:
http://mashable.com/2008/07/09/is-congress-afraid-of-the-internet/
Immediately launched petition site using Twitter's open technology:
http://letourcongresstweet.org/
Extensive FriendFeed discussion:
http://friendfeed.com/e/210ecb0e-08ea-46d9-92bc-54f598d7f687/Ok-Post-links-to-the-Congress-social-media/
A few steps back, a few steps forward, it's the Government 2.0 dance of 2008.
Posted by Marta Strickland
|
July 9, 2008 9:33 PM
Posted on July 9, 2008 21:33
Bravo! I thought your comments on how we're lagging in Gov 2.0 were right on (and thanks for the heads up about the Show Us a Better Way project -- that looks great!)
I recently finished a white paper for Don Tapscott's Gov. 2.0 project (found here: http://tinyurl.com/6fhl54) and gave a speech at the Personal Democracy Forum 2008 (you can download it at Slideshare: http://tinyurl.com/4pgfnp) on the great potential to improve transparency, involve the public on a substantive basis in policy debate and evaluation, and improve agency performance as well through a combination of automated RSS and other feeds plus Web 2.0-based data visualization tools such as Many Eyes.
I'll give a similar speech next week at Netroots Nation.
BTW: one US example that deserves mention: the District of Columbia provides more than 200 real-time data feeds under its Citywide Data Warehouse project. Mayor Fenty and CTO Vivek Kundra really get it!
Posted by W David Stephenson | July 10, 2008 7:45 AM
Posted on July 10, 2008 07:45
Thanks David.
I wish I had found your Slideshare presentation before I had written this article. There are lots of great mashup examples in there, including another project from the Sunlight Foundation, Running the Numbers on Congress Wealth:
http://fortune535.sunlightprojects.org/
Then there is the Neighborhood Knowledge project for Los Angeles:
http://nkla.sppsr.ucla.edu/master.cfm?Language=English&Look=Graphic&SessionOn=Yes
And I really like the sophisticated data visualization software Many Eyes:
http://services.alphaworks.ibm.com/manyeyes/home
Thanks for adding more links to my del.icio.us account!!
I think you are right on about the need to combine richer data streams with richer visualization tools in order to enable sophisticated mashups that empower consumers. I still feel that that is only half of the puzzle though. The other has to do with consumer collaboration.
If we could combine sophisticated mashups that increase consumer knowledge and authentic dialogue with government officials through social networking... now that is truly a revolution.
Posted by Marta Strickland
|
July 10, 2008 8:05 AM
Posted on July 10, 2008 08:05
I really like your message.
But sorry if this may offend you but you're missing a 'v' in government in this line:
While that doesn't sound like something the goernment would ever embrace, there are some major signs that the revolution is approaching.
Back to the subject at hand. I think it makes sense in politicians participating with consituents in social networks. They're working for us they might as well communicate with us more quickly through that as well.
Posted by Chris Lee | July 11, 2008 11:50 AM
Posted on July 11, 2008 11:50