<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unintentionally Viral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://threeminds.organic.com/2006/08/unintentionally-viral.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://threeminds.organic.com/2006/08/unintentionally-viral.html</link>
	<description>Covering Digital Marketing Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:52:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karl Long</title>
		<link>http://threeminds.organic.com/2006/08/unintentionally-viral.html/comment-page-1#comment-6634</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 15:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeminds.organic.com/2006/08/unintentionally-viral.html#comment-6634</guid>
		<description>Well, I actually gave them &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.experiencecurve.com/archives/why-agencycom-totally-nailed-the-subway-pitch&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;two thumbs up on my blog&lt;/a&gt;, although the 23 comments I got were a bit of a mixed bag.
My fav comment was:
&quot;Let’s agree that it’s not a positive if 20,000 people watch something and 18,000 of them decide you’re a bunch of total wankers&quot;
Certainly seems like the consensus was A for effort F for execution.
I personally think that social media turns a lot of interactive agency business models on their heads and Agency.com did this because their business is in trouble as opposed to &quot;wanting to be innovative&quot;.
I have written a follow up called &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.experiencecurve.com/archives/five-implications-for-the-social-media-agency-inspired-from-agencycom-youtube-pitch&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Five Implications for the social media agency&lt;/a&gt; that I would be interested in your perspective on as an interactive agency.
Cheers,
Karl
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I actually gave them <a href="http://blog.experiencecurve.com/archives/why-agencycom-totally-nailed-the-subway-pitch" rel="nofollow">two thumbs up on my blog</a>, although the 23 comments I got were a bit of a mixed bag.<br />
My fav comment was:<br />
&#8220;Let’s agree that it’s not a positive if 20,000 people watch something and 18,000 of them decide you’re a bunch of total wankers&#8221;<br />
Certainly seems like the consensus was A for effort F for execution.<br />
I personally think that social media turns a lot of interactive agency business models on their heads and Agency.com did this because their business is in trouble as opposed to &#8220;wanting to be innovative&#8221;.<br />
I have written a follow up called <a href="http://blog.experiencecurve.com/archives/five-implications-for-the-social-media-agency-inspired-from-agencycom-youtube-pitch" rel="nofollow">Five Implications for the social media agency</a> that I would be interested in your perspective on as an interactive agency.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Karl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Howland</title>
		<link>http://threeminds.organic.com/2006/08/unintentionally-viral.html/comment-page-1#comment-6633</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Howland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeminds.organic.com/2006/08/unintentionally-viral.html#comment-6633</guid>
		<description>This remix is worthwhile as well:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE0SsmAWI5k&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE0SsmAWI5k&lt;/a&gt;
It may be inadvertently viral, but it sure makes them look like condescending weasels- especially the part where the Actual Subway Delivery Guy shows up... I guess they don&#039;t have a subway in Westport, do they?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This remix is worthwhile as well:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE0SsmAWI5k" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE0SsmAWI5k</a><br />
It may be inadvertently viral, but it sure makes them look like condescending weasels- especially the part where the Actual Subway Delivery Guy shows up&#8230; I guess they don&#8217;t have a subway in Westport, do they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hyperman</title>
		<link>http://threeminds.organic.com/2006/08/unintentionally-viral.html/comment-page-1#comment-6632</link>
		<dc:creator>hyperman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 12:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threeminds.organic.com/2006/08/unintentionally-viral.html#comment-6632</guid>
		<description>&quot;Subway has just launched a new sub called &quot;The Agency.com.&quot; It&#039;s a super-sized sandwich with no meat, but lots of cheese. It takes you 9 minutes to eat it and then you throw up.&quot;
Nuff said!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Subway has just launched a new sub called &#8220;The Agency.com.&#8221; It&#8217;s a super-sized sandwich with no meat, but lots of cheese. It takes you 9 minutes to eat it and then you throw up.&#8221;<br />
Nuff said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

